Course Outcomes |
Learning and teaching strategies |
Assessment Strategies |
|
|
|||
Upon completion of the course students will: CO83: Understand history and methodologies of scientific research, and apply these to recent published papers CO84: Understand and practice scientific reading, writing and presentations CO85: Develop the skills of scientific communication CO86: Appreciate scientific ethics through case studies. CO87: Formulate the different parts of research article |
Class lectures Seminars Tutorials Group discussions and Workshops Question preparation
|
Class test, Semester end examinations, Quiz, Solving problems in tutorials, Assignments, Presentation |
|
Empirical science; scientific method; manipulative experiments and controls; deductive and inductive reasoning; descriptive science; reductionist vs holistic biology
Choosing a mentor, lab and research question; maintaining a lab notebook.
Concept of effective communication- setting clear goals for communication; determining outcomes and results; initiating communication; avoiding breakdowns while communicating; creating value in conversation; barriers to effective communication; non-verbal communication-interpreting non-verbal cues; importance of body language, power of effective listening; recognizing cultural differences.
Presentation skills - formal presentation skills; preparing and presenting using over-head projector, PowerPoint; defending interrogation; scientific poster preparation & presentation; participating in group discussions; Computing skills for scientific research - web browsing for information search; search engines and their mechanism of searching; hidden Web and its importance in scientific research; internet as a medium of interaction between scientists; effective email strategy using the right tone and conciseness.
Technical writing skills - types of reports; layout of a formal report; scientific writing skills - importance of communicating science; problems while writing a scientific document; plagiarism, software for plagiarism; scientific publication writing: elements of a scientific paper including abstract, introduction, materials & methods, results, discussion, references; drafting titles and framing abstracts; publishing scientific papers - peer review process and problems, recent developments such as open access and nonblind review; plagiarism; characteristics of effective technical communication; scientific presentations; ethical issues; scientific misconduct.
· Valiela, I. (2001). Doing Science: Design, Analysis, and Communication of Scientific
Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
· On Being a Scientist: a Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research. (2009).
Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
· Gopen, G. D., & Smith, J. A. The Science of Scientific Writing. American Scientist,
78 (Nov-Dec 1990), 550-558.
· Mohan, K., & Singh, N. P. (2010). Speaking English Effectively. Delhi: Macmillan
India. 5.
SUGGESTED READINGS:
· Research & Publication Ethics: A Complete Guide to Conducting & Publishing Research Ethically The Enago Academy Team Website: https://www.enago.com/academy/
· Manual for Research and Publication Ethics in Science and Engineering / Eun Seong Hwang, Eun Hee Cho, Young-Mog Kim, Kibeom Park, Wha-Chul Son, Tae-Woong Yoon, Jeong Mook Lim [Authors].—Seoul: Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies, 2016s
· Science Communication: A Practical Guide for Scientists (2012) Laura Bowater, Kay Yeoman, Wiley-Blackwell
· National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research: Third Edition. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009.Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK214564/
e-RESOURCES:
· Helgesson, Gert & Eriksson, Stefan. (2014). Plagiarism in research. Medicine, health care, and philosophy. 18. 10.1007/s11019-014-9583-8.
· Miller J. E. (2007). Preparing and presenting effective research posters. Health services research, 42(1 Pt 1), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475 6773.2006.00588.x
· Kappel Klemens, Holmen Sebastian Jon (2019) Why Science Communication, and Does It Work? A Taxonomy of Science Communication Aims and a Survey of the Empirical Evidence Frontiers in Communication https://www.sheridan.com/journals-on-topic/ismte-journal-publishing-peer-review
JOURNALS:
• Journal of Science Communication
• Science and Engineering Ethics
• Ethics & Human Research